Skip to content

The specific heat of solids II

Exercises

Preliminary provocations

  1. Why are there only 3 polarizations when there are 6 degrees of freedom in three-dimensions for an oscillator?

    The polarization is related to the direction of the amplitudes of the waves with respect to the direction of the wave. In 3D, there are only 3 different amplitude directions possible.

  2. Express the two-dimensional integral in terms of polar coordinates. You can assume rotational symmetry.

    One can convert the integral as follows:

  3. The Einstein model has a material-dependent frequency of the quantum harmonic oscillators as a free fitting parameter. What is the material-dependent parameter that plays a similar role in the Debye model?

    The Debye frequency .

  4. Derive an expression for the shortest possible wavelength in the Debye model it in terms of the interatomic distance . Hint: assume that the number of atoms is given by . Discuss if the answer is reasonable.

    From the definition of the Debye frequency, one can calculate that the wavelength is of the order of the interatomic spacing:

Exercise 1: Debye model - concepts

Consider the probability to find an atom of a 1D solid that originally had a position at a displacement shown below:

  1. Describe which -states are occupied. Explain your answer.

    It is clear that , and thus .

  2. Describe the concept of -space. What momenta are allowed in a 2D system with dimensions ?

    space is the space of possible momentum states. In 2 dimensions, a period system with dimensions will have allowed states

  3. Explain the concept of density of states.

    The density of states is the number of states per frequency

  4. Calculate the density of states for oscillations of a 3D, 2D and 1D solid with linear dispersion .

    We assume that in dimensions there are polarizations.

    For 1D we have that , hence .

    For 2D we have that , hence .

    For 3D we have that , hence .

Exercise 2: Debye model in 2D

  1. State the assumptions of the Debye model.

    The Debye model treats oscillations as sound waves with no fitting parameters

    • similar to light (but with 3 polarisations)
    • Quantisation of waves similar to Planck quantisation of light
    • Maximum cut-off frequency which is necessary to obtain total of degrees of freedom
  2. Determine the energy of a two-dimensional solid as a function of using the Debye approximation. You do not have to solve the integral.

  3. Calculate the heat capacity in the high limit.

    High temperature implies , hence , and then . We've used the value for calculated from .

  4. At low , show that . Find . Express as an indefinite integral.

    In the low temperature limit we have that , hence . Finally . We used the fact that where is the Riemann zeta function.

Exercise 3: Different oscillation modes

(adapted from exercise 2.6a of The Oxford Solid State Basics)

During the lecture we derived the low-temperature heat capacity assuming that all the modes of oscillation have the same sound velocity . In reality, the longitudinal and transverse modes have different sound velocities (see Wikipedia for an illustration of different sound wave types).

Assume that there are two types of excitations:

  • One longitudinal mode with
  • Two transverse modes with
  1. Write down the total energy of oscillations in this material.

  2. Verify that at high you reproduce the Dulong-Petit law.

    Note that we can get from so everything cancels as usual and we are left with the Dulong-Petit law .

  3. Compute the behaviour of heat capacity at low .

    In the low temperature limit we have that . We used that .

Exercise 4: Anisotropic sound velocities

(adapted from exercise 2.6b of The Oxford Solid State Basics)

Suppose now that the velocity is anisotropic () and . How does this change the Debye result for the heat capacity?

Hint

Write down the total energy as an integral over , then change the integration variables so that the spherical symmetry of the integrand is restored.

where we used the substitutions . Finally

hence . We see that the result is similar to the one with the linear dispersion, the only difference is the factor instead of .


Last update: October 30, 2023

Comments